ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 10452
Feb 28 12 8:29 PM
apluski wrote:steve19981 wrote:Apulski, No disrespect intended, but I do apologize as I think my post was little coarser than I intended it to be. As Duqduke mentioned, I was addressing a much broader audience with my Luke Fabrizius post. I place most people in two camps when it comes to Jack; those who assume he will man the post immediately and those who expect him to be an oversized 3. The way I read your post, it sounded like you lean to the later and I suppose I was addressing everyone with that opinion not just you. Since I quoted you, I can understand why you would think I was attacking you. Again not my intention. I'd like to rap that up in this thread since this is a conversation about 2013 picks and we've gotten off course. I'll open a new thread to discuss where the rebounds will come from.Steve, I have the up-most respect for you and generally find your observations to be astute and well-thought out. However, I mistook your general points-response as a mean-spirited misrepresentation of the point I was trying to make. I deeply apologize for my sarcasm, you deserve better. I will learn from my mistake and make every attempt to avoid duplicating it in future discussions. Perhaps I can make my original point more clear. Personally, I think Donovan Jack is one of the best all-around recruits we have signed since I can't remember when. I have attended five of his games and will assure you--he is for real. I think he could play for us now (opinion). Donovan has a nice all-around game but my feeling is that we still need another role player on this team--a pure rebounder. I feel confident in saying that all of us (dyed-in-the-wool Dukes' fans) have become frustrated in being out rebounded by almost every team. We may have won enough games to have made a difference this year, had we been able to rebound. I'd just like to see that addressed.Steve, again, please forgive my previous response. You are a true Duquesne gentleman.
steve19981 wrote:Apulski, No disrespect intended, but I do apologize as I think my post was little coarser than I intended it to be. As Duqduke mentioned, I was addressing a much broader audience with my Luke Fabrizius post. I place most people in two camps when it comes to Jack; those who assume he will man the post immediately and those who expect him to be an oversized 3. The way I read your post, it sounded like you lean to the later and I suppose I was addressing everyone with that opinion not just you. Since I quoted you, I can understand why you would think I was attacking you. Again not my intention. I'd like to rap that up in this thread since this is a conversation about 2013 picks and we've gotten off course. I'll open a new thread to discuss where the rebounds will come from.
Interact
Share This