Not at all. The bottom fell out with Nee. There was absolutely nothing. Everhart is better and has done some great things. He's done some not so great things too. We're in a place where we can actually afford to be picky, which is really saying something after Nee and the rest before him.

I really like RE. That said, is he a coach you see winning a couple of NCAA tourney games in a year more than one time? I have trouble envisioning that.

The bottom line is this - things are better than they were, undoubtedly. That doesn't mean they're as good as they could ever be.

Same story for GA. He's a damn sight better than BC, but seriously? Seriously?